Sample Scholarship Essays

Their Eyes Were Watching God

Their Eyes Were Watching God This novel, while poetically conveying a black woman’s pursuit of true love, seriously addresses society’s ability to be judgmental and oppressive. Gender, race, economic security, and social stratification share equally important roles in the development of the main character, Janie. Hurston vividly describes how each qualification specifically affects the character, although the racial implications are much more subtle. This subtlety allows the reader to mistakenly perceive indifferent or positive feelings towards the novels black community. Hurston initially establishes the ideal unimportance of race by using Janie’s innocent childhood memory. Janie painfully recalls Mr. Washburn, who is the father of the family with whom they live, abusively laughing at her belief of being the same as his white children.

She also remembers being teased by the other black children for her clothing, which is better than others because hers is the Washburn childrens old clothing. This recollection is multiply used by Hurston. It capitalizes childrens acceptance of people for their actions, which is surpassingly more believable than portraying adults with the same feelings. It displays the dependence of black people on white people for success. Finally, it instates the Washburn family as the representation of white culture; accordingly initiating a negative undertone towards Janies ethnicity. However, these prejudices and their undermining effect depicted within the novel are soundly contrasted by Janies peaceful disposition at the end of her narration.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

Hurston masterfully uses the emotional responses of the black characters, specifically pertaining to successful and potentially successful endeavors of Joe, as metaphors of societys prejudice. The initial astonishment of the black characters to Joes monetary holdings and accomplishments deftly conveys this idea. Hurston again attaches a plethora of meaning to these scenes. Joe is followed by the men from town, while going to purchase the land, because they do not believe a black man could have money. His houses description, as overly opulent and making the others seem as servants quarters, is parallel to the rich white men of other towns.

He faults the lazy black men for the towns lack of development, portraying the incapability of black men for leadership. He is revered by the town when he is present, then slandered when he is no longer able to hear them. Despite being freed from slavery, during the early 1900s, black peoples lives are mostly unchanged. The similarity between their work now as farmhands and formally as slaves is an active personification of this theory. The only successful black man is Joe.

The other black characters either are sharecroppers or are menially employed. This explains the contempt the two men on the porch have for Joe, which is the same contempt that they would have for a white man. Black men seldom had the opportunity, but more importantly the financial ability, to own property. This makes wealthy and successful black men extremely scarce. White men owned virtually everything.

Therefore, Joes entirety equally represents the dominating white man and the extremely unlikely black mans success. Mrs. Turner, while sharing Janies mixed racial background, speaks adamantly against blacks. She insultingly and unsuccessfully suggests that Janie marry a lighter skinned man than Tea Cake. The duality of Mrs. Turners perspective is profound. Her attitudes exploit oppressive white sentiments, while simultaneously expressing the effect slavery and continued oppression has on the black community.

She implies that black people deserve injustice. Not using a white character to display these attitudes allows Hurston more tenacity in her expression. Attempting to clean the yard after the hurricane, Tea Cake is approached by two white men. His initial reaction is to run before they see him, which he does not do. The men call him by the wrong name and coerce him into burying the dead.

This occurs within the emotional and tragic scene of loss and devastation, making the power exerted by the white men easily overlooked. They carry guns, a symbol of power, and insist that no coffin be wasted on the body of a black person and that no white person be dumped in a grave. The value society places on a black persons life is clearly made here. In the courtroom, interaction between white people and black people is shown. However, throughout the scene, Janies dialogue is conveyed by the narrator. Hurston implies the unworthiness of Janie and of black people by Janie not speaking directly with the jury, judge, and attorney.

The reference to the 12 white men being annoyed by the interruption of their daily routine simply to be the jury in a black womans trial, express his how worthless Janie feels within society. This fully explains her innermost and unconscious feelings. Though seemingly subtle, Hurston emphatically describes Janies state of mind using this method of exposing emotions. Despite these examples of injustice towards people, solely because of their skin color, the novel does not portray Hurston as a bigot. Without conveying an image of a racially accepting society and having Janie realize that her happiness is dependent exclusively on her reactions to external stimulus, the novel closes with positive feelings. The author places the responsibility for personal happiness on Janie, and subsequently, the reader.

Their eyes were watching god

In the beginning of the 20th century, it was a new era for everything, especially literature. Two new and unique literary movements began; Local Color and Naturalism. Local Color with its distinct character tone and Naturalism with its weak main character was knowingly cherished by readers. As a response to Darwinism and the inequality in America, Naturalism opened Americans’ eyes of the individual being defeated by society. Local Color freed the minds of the readers as well as the writers by putting the tone of the actual character, not everyone being sophisticated and educated. Despite the fact that Naturalism and Local Color was love, there were two notorious books of each kind; The Awakening, Naturalism, and Their Eyes were Watching God, Local Color. The Awakening by Kate Chopin was banned from most of the places and Their Eyes were Watching God by Zora Neale Hurston, a talented African-American writer, was hated by her own race. Both of the books have a main character that searches for life’s delirium; Edna Pontellier and Janie Starks. Their idea of life’s delirium was to find the perfect marriage run by love and find the true joy by and through love. Though they seem to carry the same conflict, they have similarities as well as differences in both of the novels and the characters.
Though they are coming from two different literary movements, The Awakening and Their Eyes were Watching God’s main character Janie Starks and Edna Pontellier had similarities. They were similar in that they both didn’t marry because they loved their spouse. Janie was forced to marry Logan because her grandmother wanted Janie to be happy with a rich man before she leaves Earth. Instead of considering what Janie would want, love, Janie’s grandma made Janie do it her way. Janie was asking herself, “did marriage compel love like the sun the day?” Edna married because she wanted to rebel against her parents. Her father hating the fact that Leonce was Catholic pushed it off the edge for her wanting to get married. “Add to this the violent opposition of her father(and) we need seek no further for the motives which led her to accept (Leonce).” Both of these characters got bored of their marriage. Janie never loved Logan, making her run away from him, and Edna’s love for Leonce died as soon as the fact that she was rebelling towards her parents disappeared. Both of these characters, bored with their marriage, went out to look for their delirium. They both found another man to experience true love and true happiness with. Janie found the true love after Jody died and when she met Tea-Cake and Edna found her true love with Robert.
Though with the similar characters and similar goals, the two characters were very different on how they accomplished their goals and the way they handled their matters. The biggest and the most obvious difference would be the fact that Edna was white and Janie was black and that they were on a different social class. While Edna wasn’t happy with all the money she had, Janie found true love and happiness with Tea-Cake, an adventurer who was very poor. Edna gave up her life, being crushed by the society, and Janie found the life’s delirium and accomplished her goal without being crushed by the society, and not even caring what the society thought about her. Janie enjoyed the life’s delirium and felt good. When Janie and Edna both found love, Janie stuck to it, but Edna couldn’t go any further, sleeping with another man to find that pleasure. This makes both of them a survivor of accomplishment of love, but their response to it was different. Edna felt bad toward sleeping with a man she didn’t love. “There was with her (Edna) an overwhelming feeling of irresponsibility.” Janie, on the other hand, was natural about marrying two guys and marrying Tea-Cake not too long after Jody died. When Phoeby didn’t want Janie to sound happy, Janie replied, “Let’em say what dey wants tuh, Phoeby. To my thinkin’ mourning oughtn’t tuh last longer’n grief.”
Edna, being destroyed by society, was the epitome of Naturalism, and Janie, being a survivor, surely was full of hope and was the epitome of Local Color. Edna was a weak main character who died by what society told her and gave up her life. Though she fell in love with Robert, she didn’t end up with him because she was too weak. She wasn’t strong enough and she gave up on herself and Robert. “He (Robert) would never understand and her strength was gone.” Janie, on the other hand, was a very strong character. She failed to find her joy or life’s delirium, from both of her first two husband, Logan and Jody, but she didn’t give up. Although she was old, she didn’t give up hope to marry another man who she can find true love with. She wasn’t hesitant about anything, because she didn’t care what others had to say, and went with her own intuition. She was very confident that she was doing the right thing and others were all wrong. “They got tuh go tuh God, and they got tuh find out about livin’ fuh theyselves.” She knew that she was doing the right thing and the society couldn’t stop her from marrying Tea-Cake.
From these two novels, we see the difference in Naturalism and Local Color, especially by the main characters’ actions. On the search for life’s delirium, both Edna and Janie found it, but Edna failed to keep that joy. Both of their first marriage wasn’t base on love and that is the reason why both of their marriage failed. On Janie’s case, both of her first two husbands were rich, but she didn’t find the joy until she met poor adventurer, Tea Cake. Edna, looking for excitement, wanted to rebel against her dad by marrying Leonce. She found the joy sucked out and died. She was very rich when she hated her life. Ironically, materialistic people believes opposite; strong belief of money buying happiness. This seems like a case that goes against that theory; money can’t buy happiness and those two are very opposite.
Can anyone of you please correct my essay for grammar/spelling check and also contents? go hard on me please… thank you
In the beginning of the 20th century, it was a new era for everything, especially literature. Two new and unique literary movements began; Local Color and Naturalism. Local Color with its distinct character tone and Naturalism with its weak main character was knowingly cherished by readers. As a response to Darwinism and the inequality in America, Naturalism opened Americans’ eyes of the individual being defeated by society. Local Color freed the minds of the readers as well as the writers by putting the tone of the actual character, not everyone being sophisticated and educated. Despite the fact that Naturalism and Local Color was love, there were two notorious books of each kind; The Awakening, Naturalism, and Their Eyes were Watching God, Local Color. The Awakening by Kate Chopin was banned from most of the places and Their Eyes were Watching God by Zora Neale Hurston, a talented African-American writer, was hated by her own race. Both of the books have a main character that searches for life’s delirium; Edna Pontellier and Janie Starks. Their idea of life’s delirium was to find the perfect marriage run by love and find the true joy by and through love. Though they seem to carry the same conflict, they have similarities as well as differences in both of the novels and the characters.
Though they are coming from two different literary movements, The Awakening and Their Eyes were Watching God’s main character Janie Starks and Edna Pontellier had similarities. They were similar in that they both didn’t marry because they loved their spouse. Janie was forced to marry Logan because her grandmother wanted Janie to be happy with a rich man before she leaves Earth. Instead of considering what Janie would want, love, Janie’s grandma made Janie do it her way. Janie was asking herself, “did marriage compel love like the sun the day?” Edna married because she wanted to rebel against her parents. Her father hating the fact that Leonce was Catholic pushed it off the edge for her wanting to get married. “Add to this the violent opposition of her father(and) we need seek no further for the motives which led her to accept (Leonce).” Both of these characters got bored of their marriage. Janie never loved Logan, making her run away from him, and Edna’s love for Leonce died as soon as the fact that she was rebelling towards her parents disappeared. Both of these characters, bored with their marriage, went out to look for their delirium. They both found another man to experience true love and true happiness with. Janie found the true love after Jody died and when she met Tea-Cake and Edna found her true love with Robert.
Though with the similar characters and similar goals, the two characters were very different on how they accomplished their goals and the way they handled their matters. The biggest and the most obvious difference would be the fact that Edna was white and Janie was black and that they were on a different social class. While Edna wasn’t happy with all the money she had, Janie found true love and happiness with Tea-Cake, an adventurer who was very poor. Edna gave up her life, being crushed by the society, and Janie found the life’s delirium and accomplished her goal without being crushed by the society, and not even caring what the society thought about her. Janie enjoyed the life’s delirium and felt good. When Janie and Edna both found love, Janie stuck to it, but Edna couldn’t go any further, sleeping with another man to find that pleasure. This makes both of them a survivor of accomplishment of love, but their response to it was different. Edna felt bad toward sleeping with a man she didn’t love. “There was with her (Edna) an overwhelming feeling of irresponsibility.” Janie, on the other hand, was natural about marrying two guys and marrying Tea-Cake not too long after Jody died. When Phoeby didn’t want Janie to sound happy, Janie replied, “Let’em say what dey wants tuh, Phoeby. To my thinkin’ mourning oughtn’t tuh last longer’n grief.”
Edna, being destroyed by society, was the epitome of Naturalism, and Janie, being a survivor, surely was full of hope and was the epitome of Local Color. Edna was a weak main character who died by what society told her and gave up her life. Though she fell in love with Robert, she didn’t end up with him because she was too weak. She wasn’t strong enough and she gave up on herself and Robert. “He (Robert) would never understand and her strength was gone.” Janie, on the other hand, was a very strong character. She failed to find her joy or life’s delirium, from both of her first two husband, Logan and Jody, but she didn’t give up. Although she was old, she didn’t give up hope to marry another man who she can find true love with. She wasn’t hesitant about anything, because she didn’t care what others had to say, and went with her own intuition. She was very confident that she was doing the right thing and others were all wrong. “They got tuh go tuh God, and they got tuh find out about livin’ fuh theyselves.” She knew that she was doing the right thing and the society couldn’t stop her from marrying Tea-Cake.
From these two novels, we see the difference in Naturalism and Local Color, especially by the main characters’ actions. On the search for life’s delirium, both Edna and Janie found it, but Edna failed to keep that joy. Both of their first marriage wasn’t base on love and that is the reason why both of their marriage failed. On Janie’s case, both of her first two husbands were rich, but she didn’t find the joy until she met poor adventurer, Tea Cake. Edna, looking for excitement, wanted to rebel against her dad by marrying Leonce. She found the joy sucked out and died. She was very rich when she hated her life. Ironically, materialistic people believes opposite; strong belief of money buying happiness. This seems like a case that goes against that theory; money can’t buy happiness and those two are very opposite.

x

Hi!
I'm Abigail

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out