Sample Scholarship Essays

Pornography

Pornography Sexual morality has declined in America today. The immoral life can be seen all around us. We see it in drugs, alcohol, movies, magazines, gangs, teenage pregnancy, pre-marital sex, and society as a whole. A person can walk into almost any convenience store and purchase a magazine depicting naked women. Videos and movies with graphic sex scenes can be rented or watched in any movie theater.

They have become more common than ever before. Almost every movie with an R rating will have at least one sex scene. Even Forrest Gump, a highly acclaimed movie, had a sexual act and nudity involved. Also public television has been known to show nudity and sex. Allusions are made to sex in every part of our life. Work, school, sports, and recreation are all forums through which unhealthy sexual views are expressed.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

One of the more predominant and obvious forums for the proliferation of unhealthy sexual desires is pornography. Pornography is displaying the human body in a perverse, sexual way. It can be found in film, magazine, television, on CD-ROM, and even the internet, and can range from soft-core, depicting natural poses and action, to hard-core, or depicting sex combined with violence, that any reasonable, decent, well- adjusted human being would recognize as horrible and disgusting. Much pornography is socially acceptable, with few people actively speaking out against it. Pornography can be bought at many adult or adult novelty shops.

One only has to listen to any popular local radio station after 8 P.M. to hear strings of advertisements for local pornographic outlets. Television advertisements are shown also, but not as often as on the radio. Pornography is so socially acceptable in today’s society, that it is protected by the same amendment to the constitution that allows Pro-Life groups to protest abortion, the first amendment to the constitution. For years, the first amendment has been quoted to support pornography, as well as everything from freedom to protest abortion, to freedom of holding Nazi views. The first amendment was drafted, not to protect boring, popular, or inoffensive views, however, but to protect the right of people to hold and express controversial ideas.

There is a line, though. A television network cannot show images of children having sex, but it can show a naked woman, if the perspective is such that certain parts of her body are not seen. In Germany, access is blocked to certain chat rooms which contain pedophile pornography. In Denmark, the government has dropped all legal barriers against pornography for adults. Explicit magazines cannot be sold to anyone under the age of eighteen, showing some morality is still intact in America today, if not entirely.

The Church’s stand on pornography is clear and obvious. The Catholic Church is adamantly against all pornography. Pornography ..offends against chastity because it perverts the conjugal act, the intimate giving of spouses to each other. It does grave injury to the dignity of its participants (actors, vendors, the public), since each one becomes an object of base pleasure and illicit profit for others. The church’s view is that ..civil authorities should prevent the production and distribution of pornographic materials.

God has willed that the expression of sexual ideas be within the confines of marriage. No man has the right to violate the will of God, and pornography is a violation of this will. It is an unnatural act, a immoral human act. The responsibility of the church over the matter of pornography is to be a clear, constant teacher of the faith, especially objective moral truth. We live in a time of permissiveness of moral violation and confusion. It is a time that demands that the church be a clear voice of morality and its role in society. Pornography and wanton violence in the media can blind people to the divine images, the very likeness of God, in the human being.

We are made in the image of God, and to portray that image in a perverse and corrupt way for the enjoyment of others is not only immoral, but goes against our human nature and purpose, to know, love, and serve God in this life, as well as through to the next. To willingly disobey God and pervert one of his creatures is sacrilegious, and a grave offense against God. We must educate those in Catholic schools as to why pornography is wrong, and why we must fight against it. Combined, the voices of all morally fit individuals in society would be loud enough to cause the communications industry to cease the senseless proliferation of immoral content into society. Everyone must resist the temptation and not give in to the grip that pornography has on a lot of people in this world. As it is now, in an unscientific poll, if offered just $100,000 to pose for a pornographic magazine, almost fifty percent of high school students would seriously consider performing this immoral and unspeakable act. Pornography has many obvious as well as not-so-obvious consequences within society.

Pornography has the power to ruin marriages, destroy trust, excite a person to the point of sexual crime, or create an unhealthy view of human sexuality and the opposite sex. If a married man purchases a pornographic magazine and looks through it, he involuntarily loses some respect for the opposite sex, by reducing them to an object to satisfy his sexual desire. If the magazine is discovered by his wife, she loses faith in him, weakening their marriage bond. If the magazine is discovered by one of his children, male or female, that child begins to form an unhealthy view of sexuality. Any person allowing themselves to be used to satisfy the sexual desire of another is sinning by causing another person to lust.

There own perception of self-worth is diminished, as well as their perception of healthy sexual expression. Dress is another thing that causes a person to lust. If a young woman is dressed immodestly, it causes a man to desire her. Therefore, it is very important that every person dress modestly and not care what others think of their dress. When a young woman dresses immodestly, this may suggest that she is easy and some people will look down on her. The restaurant chain Hooters is a perfect example of a bad taste in dress.

The restaurant features scantily-clad women working as waitresses giving food to men who are only there to lust after them. Over seventy-five percent of the men are married. On society as a whole, pornography acts as a moral anesthetic, deadening us to the effects of immoral life. Pornography is as much as a drug as alcohol is. When you get started on it, you cannot control yourself, and is hard to quit.

The view of moral human sexuality is greatly harmed, when a person can walk past storefronts boasting Girls, Girls, Girls. Society as a whole needs to re-think its position on pornography, as well as human sexuality entirely. Also as individuals, we need to think about how our actions in regards to human sexuality affect those around us, as well as ourselves, our relationship with others, and our relationship with God. Pornography is accepted in the world today. Any movie theatre won’t hesitate to show a movie with pornography depicted in it if it will sell.

The same goes for any bookstore which sells magazines. You can go into any major bookstore chain and see a Playboy magazine on the rack next to Sports Illustrated. Now what does this suggest? It suggests that Playboy is as widely read as Sports Illustrated. The movie industry has glorified pornography in many movies. Movies are the main source of pornography, along with magazines. Any person can see pornography when watching one of the pay channels on the television late at night.

This provides the oppurtunity for anyone with access to these channels to see pornography. Many children have access to this. Also anyone with a computer and access to the internet has the oppurtunity to pick up some pornography. Some restrictions should be made on these things but people say that it violates their First Amendment right. Pornography is something that shouldn’t be around.

Women shouldn’t be portrayed as sexual objects, but as an individual. Pornography is a very bad thing that severes your relationship with God and is a big sin. ————————————————– ———— Sociology Issues.

Pornography

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Bush administration, under fire for scrapping Clinton standards for arsenic in drinking water, announced plans Wednesday to tighten the standards within nine months.
Christine Whitman, administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, said she was asking the National Academy of Sciences to examine the impact of a range of possible reductions.
Bush had drawn heavy criticism from environmentalists and others last month when his EPA killed a Clinton administration regulation that would have tightened the standard to no more than 10 parts of arsenic per billion in drinking water. The current standard, set in 1942, is 50 parts per billion.
Whitman said she wanted a panel of scientists at the academy to examine a standard in the range of three to 20 parts per billion.
U.S. Geological Survey has mapped arsenic concentrations in many U.S. counties
“The Bush administration is committed to protecting the environment and the health of all Americans,” Whitman said in a written statement, promising a final regulation within nine months.
She said the decision to seek a report from the academy would “ensure that a standard will be put in place in a timely manner that provides clean, safe and affordable drinking water for the nation and is based on the best science.”
The Bush administration’s decision on March 20 to stop the regulation put into place three days before the end of the Clinton presidency created an uproar among environmentalists, congressional Democrats and members of the public.
Whitman argued there was insufficient scientific evidence to justify the $200 million annual cost to municipalities, states and industry of meeting the new Clinton standards by 2006.
“I have said consistently that we will obtain the necessary scientific review … and that we will establish that standard in a timely manner,” she said Wednesday.
The administration plans to issue a new regulation that still meets the same timeframe for compliance as the Clinton standard.
In 1999, the National Academy of Sciences said that arsenic in drinking water can cause bladder, lung and skin cancer, and might cause liver and kidney cancer.
The Clinton EPA had initially proposed setting the standard at 5 parts per billion last year in response to a lawsuit by the Natural Resources Defense Council, but then settled at 10 parts per billion.
Environmentalists, who have argued for years that the arsenic standard should be stricter, criticized the EPA on Wednesday for putting off a final decision.
“We’re outraged that this is going to assure a year of delays for protection of public health for millions of Americans,” NRDC senior attorney Erik D. Olson said.
He said the parameters set by Whitman are “a pretty clear signal” that the EPA is headed toward settling at 20 parts per billion — twice the amount that Clinton would have allowed.
Bibliography:
NRDC senior attorney Erik D. Olson said.
He said the parameters set by Whitman are “a pretty clear signal” that the EPA is headed toward settling at 20 parts per billion — twice the amount that Clinton would have allowed.

x

Hi!
I'm Abigail

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out