Sample Scholarship Essays

Gun Control

Gun Control One in four households in the United States have a loaded handgun. This stunning fact is unbelievable yet true. Anyone in the household could gain access to this deadly firearm. Gun control is needed in todays society. Gun control would prove that guns arent a necessity of todays life.

It would also lower the crime rate. Gun control is a large factor of safety. Gun control is essential since it will prove guns arent needed in todays world. Our society and our way of life have changed since the constitution was written. When the constitution was written, people did not live close together as people do today. People lived on huge farms and hunting was their main source of food.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

They couldnt just run to the store to buy food. They had to hunt animals for food. They also had to protect themselves from the trials of the harsh wilderness. They also needed a gun to protect themselves from animal attacks and thieves in the night. To these people, guns were absolutely necessary for survival. Today, guns are not needed because we no longer are in danger from those situations, considering the times have changed.

Another example is the fact that guns are used for protection. Guns cause more havoc than protection. It is very rare that a gun is used to create peace. In todays world, there are police forces keeping peace. The controlling of firearms would cause the crime and murder rate to decrease. Most crimes today involve a firearm.

Between 1933 and 1982, nearly one million Americans were killed by firearms in murders, suicides, and accidents. Since 1960, more than half a million people have died as the result of gun injuries. In 1992, at least 35,000 people had died by gunfire. Today, among all consumer products, only cars outpace guns as a cause of fatal injury. Guns will likely pass them by 2003.¹ If guns were better controlled, the crime rate would go favorably down since guns cause many fatal injuries. Between 1985 and 1994, an average of 274,000 guns were reported stolen to the FBI each year.¹ It is obvious that guns cause crimes.

If firearms were under control, America would be a much safer place. When a gun is involved, there is always a chance someone will be injured or killed. On April 27, 1998, a teenage boy opened fire on fellow students and teachers at a school dance in rural northwestern Pennsylvania, killing a teacher and wounding two youths.² Handguns and assault rifles are suited for killing people therefore they should be controlled or even banned. People are not using these weapons in the proper way. Children as victims of guns is another example of gun hazards. In Greensboro, North Carolina, a four-year-old boy shot and killed a six year old playmate.

The six year old was shot in the neck on his birthday, after the children found a loaded .38 caliber semi-automatic handgun in a purse.² A child doesnt know much about how deadly a loaded firearm can be. This is why children shouldnt ever be in a situation involving a gun. If guns were properly controlled, this wouldnt be a worry. Gun control is an essential key in todays world. There is absolutely no practical use for automatic assault rifles.

More weapons mean more crime. Guns under control would create a much safer environment. Sadly enough, a person will be murdered by a handgun in the next sixty minutes.

Gun Control

Gun Control In 1988, handguns killed 7 people in Great Britain 19 in Sweden 53 in Switzerland 25 in Israel 13 in Australia 8 in Canada And 8,915 in the United States The figures are shocking but what is the solution? Gun control is a problem that our country has faced for many years. In the past this issue has been placed on the back burner but the recent school, subway, and gang related shootings have pushed it to the forefront of political and social issues. There are basically three categories in the dispute for gun control. The extreme “right” which thinks anyone should have access to any weapon or ammunition. The extreme “left” who believe Government should have ultimate control of all handguns in the United States, and that possession of guns or ammunition should be illegal. In the middle are the “moderates” who think that gun control including background checks, training classes, and waiting periods would solve the problem.

Gun control is an issue that is surrounded by many myths and misunderstanding, with more than its share of misinformation. In the following pages we will explore all sides of this argument and offer up our own solution. BACKGROUND As mentioned in the introduction, the gun control issue has not been in the media or political spotlight until recently, approximately ten years ago. Before that time the idea of gun control was on the minds of few people, but today it’s a major issue. Know it’s impossible to pick up a newspaper or watch the evening news without being bombarded with the details of another mass shooting, or another child that was killed while playing with a gun. Unfortunately, there are many people who take the easy way out when it comes to a solution, they choose gun control.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

They make this decision without ever taking the time or effort to educate themselves on the issue. In their minds choosing gun control means caring about children, and wanting to stop the violence we have all become so accustomed to. We believe that misunderstanding and misinformation are the two biggest culprits when it comes to the argument over gun control. If every citizen were to educate themselves the messages from the gun control advocates would fall on deaf ears. MYTH vs.

REALITY The following is a list of ten of the most widely misunderstandings about crime, guns, and gun control. Myth #1: Guns cause crime. There is no relationship between the number of guns and the amount of crime in the United States. Between 1973 and 1992, the rate of gun ownership increased by 45% while the homicide rate during that period fell by nearly 10%. Myth #2: Gun control laws reduce crime.

Firearms have not been regulated in the United States for most of the past thirty years. The number of firearms in private hands has increased continuously by millions per year. Yet the rate of crime, violent crime, and homicide have shown no significant correlation. Myth #3: Gun control laws stop friends from killing friends. Most murderers and victims of homicide have criminal records and they are likely to have other criminals as friends. While it is true that in many cases of homicide the offender and victim know each other, it is not true that these “friends killing friends” are the plain ordinary folks often portrayed in the anti-gun propaganda.

Myth #4: Gun control laws keep criminals from obtaining guns. In surveys of prisoners, only 7% of criminals’ handguns were obtained from legitimate sources. Three-fourths of the felons report that they would have no trouble obtaining a gun when they were released. Myth #5: Required waiting periods would prevent some of the most vicious crimes. The Brady Bill waiting period imposes waiting periods on handguns, the least deadly type of firearm, while imposing no such restriction on much more deadly weapons such as rifles or shotguns.

While handguns are preferred by criminals because of their portability and concealability not every criminal who planned to use a handgun will abandon his criminal plans when confronted by a waiting period. Myth #6: Guns don’t work as self-protection against criminals. Guns are about as valuable to civilians as they are to police officers. As many as 65 lives are protected by guns for every life lost to a gun. Every year potential victims kill between 2,000 and 3,000 criminals, and wound an additional 9,000 to 17,000. Private citizens mistakenly kill innocent people only thirty times a year, compared to about 310 mistaken killings by police. Criminals succeed in taking a gun away from an armed victim less than 1% of the time. Myth #7: Guns aren’t needed as self-protection. Approximately 83% of the population will be victims in their lives, and there is only one police officer for every 3,300 people.

Myth #8: Gun control laws are needed to prevent the purchase of Saturday Night Specials and “assault weapons.” Inexpensive handguns are involved in only 1% to 3% of violent crimes; criminals generally prefer larger caliber and more expensive handguns. In the past fifty years no civilian has ever used a legally owned machine gun in a violent crime, and no UZI has ever been used to kill a police officer. Myth #9: Gun control laws are especially needed to prevent gun accidents in the home. Many people mistakenly conclude that children die frequently in gun accidents and that sharp restrictions on gun ownership are necessary to address the problem. There are accidents that occur in the home, but that number has fallen dramatically.

The death rate from firearm accidents is lower than that from accidental drowning, inhalation, and digestion of foreign objects. Myth #10: Gun ownership is not a constitutional right. The Second Amendment reflects the founders’ belief that armed citizens (called militias) were necessary precaution against tyranny by our own government and its army. PRO GUN CONTROL Handgun Control Inc. (HCI) is the leading organization that is lobbying for, and introducing legislation on gun control to the Congress.

It is organized and chaired by Sarah Brady, the wife of gun violence victim and former White House Press Secretary James Brady. She was the driving force behind the recently adopted “Brady Bill” which made a mandatory waiting period for the purchase of a handgun. She is know working on the “Children’s Gun Violence Protection Act”, which will impose the following: 1. New safety standards on the manufacture and importation of handguns, including a child resistance standard, a safety lock, a magazine disconnect safety for pistols, a manual safety, and drop test equipment. 2. Authorize the Consumer Products Safety Commission to study, test, and evaluate various technologies and means of making guns more child-resistant.

3. Prohibit the sale of an assault weapon to anyone under the age of 18. 4. Increase the criminal penalties for selling a gun to a juvenile. 5. Require gun storeowners to implement minimum safety and security standards to prevent theft of firearms.

6. Require gun owners to store loaded guns in a place that is reasonably inaccessible to children, or use a device to lock the gun, and imposes criminal penalties for adults who leave firearms available for illegal use by children. These may all sound like wonderful ideas if this is all you know about the subject. However, one must ask the question, are these new rules and regulations really going to serve their purpose? Or are they only going to succeed in taking away more of our constitutional rights? RECOMMENDATIONS Our recommendation would suggest that both parties should be able to agree on common ground. It would not hurt all gun owners to submit to background checks and waiting periods. This should not only include handguns, but rifles as well. However, there is no reason that pro-gun control advocates should continue their crusade to ban certain types of weapons and ammunition.

Stiff mandatory laws should be established and enforced for those who are unwilling to obey these new regulations. The laws should be the same in all states in order to do away with the senseless lawsuits being brought against the gun manufacturers. CONCLUSION In our misinformed society, when we hear politicians saying they are pro gun control we automatically translate that as meaning they care about the children, it makes us feel good. That is what it is all about, feeling good. Letting feelings run our lives and make the decisions for us, instead of educating ourselves on the issues and then making informed decisions. It has to do with choosing feelings over substance.

The gun control crowd has managed to hype up the crime in this country and pass all the blame on the guns, forget the fact that someone has to pull the trigger. They tell glamorous and violent stories of gruesome killings and accidental shootings, and then promote gun control as the cure-all idea. While at the same time cast the “right” as wanting to kill your children, put guns in our schools, give guns to your children, and basically run all over the country shooting people. While some basic gun legislation might be in order, what these people are trying to do is throw the Second Amendment right out the window. Here is a quote from the founder of HCI: “I’m convinced that we have to have Federal Legislation to build on. We are going to have to take one step at a time, and the first step is necessarily, given the political realities, going to be very modest.

Our ultimate goal, total control of handguns in the United States, is going to take time. The first problem is to slow down the increasing number of handguns being produced and sold in this country. The second problem is to get handguns registered, and the final problem is to make the possession of all handguns, and handgun ammunition illegal.” This is really demented thinking that shows what incrementalism can do once it gets started.

Gun Control

Everyone in the United States of America has an opinion on gun control regardless of their age, race, or religion. From within those opinions arguments are formed. People are arguing about gun control at their jobs, at their schools, and sometimes at their places of worship. On one side of things there are the people that support gun control like certain politicians or political organizations, teachers, police officers, and so on. On the other side of things there are the people that are against gun control, people such as hunters and various types of criminals. When it comes down to sensitive topics like gun control, there are very few people that do not choose a side. The Second Amendment, like all Amendments that constitute the Bill of Rights, is not absolute. There are vague legal boundaries that have been set down thus far which answers some questions, but leave many more open (Sanders).

Over the past few years there have been many incidents when children bring guns to school and shoot their fellow classmate(s) and/or teacher(s). The most recent and probably most tragic happened in 1998 at Colombine High School in Colorado when a group of students entered the school and murdered several students and a teacher.The first thing that everyone wondered once they finally heard the news is how the children got the guns? Supporters of gun control believe that if there were harsher gun laws, a lot of the school shootings would have never taken place and a lot of lives could have been saved. In a Brooklyn, New York federal court case brought against gun makers by individual people, a jury found that 15 of the gun making companies had negligently flooded southern states with guns, where control laws that are lax, and fed a black market of guns to states with more stringent controls, like New York (Nesbitt). This proves that if gun control advocates can win in a place like New York with tougher gun control laws, they can win in almost any major city, which could also lead to the federal government passing more gun control laws.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

In Georgia, pro-gun forces scored a victory when Governor Roy Barnes, a Democrat endorsed by the National Rifle Association while campaigning, signed legislation that keeps all the cities in that state from suing gun manufacturers (Nesbitt). Though it is not right, it is obvious that street gangs and drug dealers have a say in this argument. Starting from the bottom of the cycle to the top: if street thugs didn’t have guns, how would they be able to protect themselves and the drugs they sell in order to make a living, who would they intimidate, what authority would the police and drug enforcement officers have over criminals, and how would they protect themselves? Without guns the crime rate would decrease rapidly, crime fighters would be out of business, and many people would be unemployed. In rural areas and in farming communities there are also some people that like to hunt. Without a gun they would not be able to hunt, which could have a positive or negative affect on their community. The positive affect would be that some endangered species would be given the change to multiply and survive. The negative affect would be that the hunters would not be able to provide food for his family and a lot of over-populated and dangerous species would continue to grow.

According to one Web site, every hour in the United States someone under the age of 25 dies from a gunshot wound. There are also nearly 200 million firearms in this country and a new one is produced every eight seconds (“Gun Violence”).

x

Hi!
I'm Abigail

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out